By ZEINA KARAM , BEIRUT, Lebanon Feb 11, 2006 (AP)

Critics worry that Hezbollah has become the Lebanese arm of an anti-U.S. regional front for Iran and Syria. Anti-Syrian politician Walid Jumblatt and others have said Lebanon should not be "a barricade for Iran’s nuclear facilities."

Referring to Hezbollah’s leader, Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, Jumblatt said Friday: "No matter how strong he is and he is strong as a simple Lebanese citizen I say no to Syrian and Iranian tutelage."

Meanwhile, Hezbollah faces a 2004 U.N. Security Council resolution demanding it disarm.

Lebanon’s many militias disarmed in 1991 after a 15-year civil war ended, but Hezbollah kept its weapons, saying it needed them to fight Israel’s occupation of southern Lebanon.

The Lebanese army of about 70,000 troops with a modest arsenal could not move against Hezbollah for fear it would split along sectarian lines as happened in the civil war.

The Israelis left in 2000, but Hezbollah fights on over a disputed piece of land called Chebaa Farms. It maintains that Israel, having twice invaded Lebanon, could do so again, and has been cool to the idea of merging into the Lebanese army, lest its options be curtailed in any future conflict with Israel.

It has mortars, rocket-propelled grenades, rifles and more than 10,000 Katyusha rockets. It is believed able to field thousands of armed supporters, drawn from the Shiite Muslim community who are Lebanon’s largest single sect.

Nasrallah says he is open to discussions on the arms, and he disputes the idea that his group does the bidding of Damascus or Tehran.

To burnish his credentials as a Lebanese political figure, Nasrallah joined hands last week with a major anti-Syrian Christian leader, Michel Aoun. The two men called for a national defense strategy that would deal, among other matters, with the weapons issue.

"How do we protect Lebanon and what is the best strategic way to protect the country when we agree on that, we can discuss the weapons," Nasrallah said.

Hezbollah’s evolving stance on weapons and loyalties indicate it is searching for new rules after the Syrian withdrawal, said Ibrahim Bayram, an analyst with Lebanon’s leading An-Nahar daily.

"Whether there is a Syrian agenda or not, whether there is an Iranian agenda or not, Hezbollah feels it is being sidelined and oppressed by the (anti-Syrian) majority," he said.

The issue of allegiance came to a head Dec. 12 when the Cabinet put to a vote the request for international court proceedings after a U.N. probe implicated Syria in the assassination a year ago of former Lebanese leader Rafik Hariri.

Hezbollah’s ministers walked out, setting off a seven-week crisis. It ended when the government reiterated its recognition of Hezbollah as a "resistance" group. That sidesteps the term "militia," exempting Hezbollah at least for now from a U.N. resolution that calls for the disarmament of all militias.

In the 1980s, militants linked to Hezbollah were accused of holding Western hostages and killing hundreds in bomb attacks on U.S. and French military targets. The 2000 Israeli withdrawal, under Hezbollah’s military pressure, sharply boosted the group’s status, but its position became more tentative when its street demonstrations against the Syrian withdrawal were eclipsed by larger anti-Syrian rallies.

Now it is urgently trying to sharpen its Lebanese colors and distinguish itself from Syria and Iran, analyst Bayram said.

"For them, it’s a fight for survival and they are engaged in self-defense," he said.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.